Filed in archive
Virtualization
by Scott Wilson on July 2, 2008

Microsoft's virtualization products have long lagged behind competitors in flexibility and features, and in some cases performance, which may be the most important factor considering the purpose of the technology: to cram more running systems onto a single hardware platform than ever before.
The performance benchmarks on Hyper-V (cited here by ZDNet's Jason Perlow) are impressive. I/O blocking, a traditional pitfall for virtualized systems, has been reduced such that virtual servers are able to achieve nearly the performance of the base hardware. Further tuning has reportedly optimized Hyper-V for popular Microsoft enterprise products such as SQL and Exchange Server.
This combination of vendor supported virtualization and optimized performance, taken together with a dramatically simplified licensing structure, may open the market up for Microsoft with more conservative IT establishments taking the plunge into virtualization. The sweetener is the licensing, which effectively allows four for one pricing on Windows Server... if it's not free as in Linux, it's a lot closer than it was, and Microsoft shops are sure to take advantage of it.
The product still falls down on a number of important features for the production datacenter, however, including live instance migration and dynamic resource allocation. The support for non-Microsoft products is, as expected, generally weak. Nonetheless, this appears to be a strong product, and VMware will be pressed by the cost-dynamics of the Microsoft licensing model in ways which may not be pleasant in the long run.
Permalink: Hyper-V hits the streets
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/127378
Mr Wong
Vote for Hyper-V hits the streets:
|
Rating: 7.50 out of 2 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Faisal Khan
(07/06/08 11:31am)
Response from:
Scott Wilson
(07/15/08 11:03am)
Hi Faisal.
I'm sure that is the perception among the pundits, but I think that's a case of being too close to the trees to see the forest. Citrix, in the broader perspective, is a niche player in the Microsoft market, and their acquisition of XenSource has given them the barest foothold in the virtualization race, one which I don't think they are in a position to win with. If VMWare doesn't Citrix, Microsoft will.
I absolutely agree with you about VMWare's position, though. It's their's to lose.
I'm sure that is the perception among the pundits, but I think that's a case of being too close to the trees to see the forest. Citrix, in the broader perspective, is a niche player in the Microsoft market, and their acquisition of XenSource has given them the barest foothold in the virtualization race, one which I don't think they are in a position to win with. If VMWare doesn't Citrix, Microsoft will.
I absolutely agree with you about VMWare's position, though. It's their's to lose.
Subscribe
Marketplace
-
Online MBA Degrees - earn your mba degree online with one of hundreds of programs available at elearners.com
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |











VMware's large installed base and get right formula is really hard to beat, not to mention they ONLY focus on virtualization!
Faisal